Nursing Blog
In this weeks New England Journal of Medicine there are two articles about nurses that are related to to expanding field of practice of nurings and relationships with doctors. Below are the two articles that address this topic along with a MSNBC article on the article that address teh perspectives of physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. If you want the articles below just log into the library site and cute and paste the article title in the PubMed search box.
- MSNBC Article About the Perspectives Article: "Doctors doubt nurses skills, survey finds - Vitals" ( http://nbcnews.to/17z0fHx )
- Donelan, K., DesRoches, C. M., Dittus, R. S., & Buerhaus, P. (2013). Perspectives of physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. N Engl J Med, 368(20), 1898-1906. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1212938
- Iglehart, J. K. (2013). Expanding the role of advanced nurse practitioners -- risks and rewards. N Engl J Med, 368(20), 1935-1941. doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr1301084
When it comes to health care, patients play a vital role and need to be informed and able to talk to their physician about the care they need or are about to receive. To that end, there is a resource that has been created by ABIM, which is an organization of medical professionals whose aim is to improve health care through the advancement of medical professionalism. The resource is called Choosing Wiselyand the aim of the resource is to promote conversations between physicians and patients by helping patients choose care that is:
- Supported by evidence
- Not duplicative of other tests or procedures already received
- Free from harm
- Truly necessary
The site points out that the recommendations made by the site should not be used to establish coverage decisions or exclusions. These recommendations are meant to spur conversation about what is appropriate and necessary treatment.
If you are interested in another resource that is based on the best evidence to help consumers made more informed decisions, this resource could be one to check out. You can find the website by clicking on the link below:
The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) group is known for the statement/standards it has issued in the past for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Recently though the group has also issue a statement about the best practices for abstracts that pertain to systematic reviews and conference abstracts. A link to the statement, as well as the PRISMA website.
Summary Points of Statement for Abstracts
- The abstract of a systematic review should provide a structured summary that enables a quick assessment of the review's validity and applicability, and easy identification in electronic searching.
- Despite published guidance on writing the abstract in the PRISMA Statement guiding the reporting of systematic reviews in general and elsewhere, evaluations show that reporting of systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts is poor.
- We developed consensus-based reporting guidelines as an extension to the PRISMA Statement on good reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in abstracts.
- The PRISMA for Abstracts checklist gives authors a framework for condensing their systematic review into the essentials for an abstract that will meet the needs of many readers.
(Beller, E. M., Glasziou, P. P., Altman, D. G., Hopewell, S., Bastian, H., Chalmers, I., ... & Tovey, D. (2013). PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts. PLoS medicine, 10(4), e1001419.)

|
Tuesday, May 7, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Wednesday, May 8, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Brown Bag Lunch: Strategies and Tools for Patient Recruitment |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 |
||
|
3:00pm |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 |
||
|
12:15pm |
Online |
|
|
Thursday, May 30, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
A new report has been released by US Department of Health & Human Services entitled "The U.S. Nursing Workforce: Trends in Supply and Education." It present datas on the supply, distribution and educational information about the U.S. nursing workforce. It covers both registered nurses (RN) and licensed practical nurses (LPN) workforces in the United States.
The report can be found at - http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/nursingworkforce/index.html.
Dr. Jen Nooney, lead author, will present findings from this report and the National Center's nursing workforce agenda at our next Health Workforce Webinar, scheduled for May 14, 2013, at 2PM ET. Webinar details can be found at http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/index.html.
I wanted to let you know that the TEDMED 2013 Conference is being live simulcast at Tompkins-McCaw Library if you should be interested from April 17th - 19th. The TED (technology, entertainment, design) conference series began in the mid-1980s. The TEDMED conference talks focus on health and medicine. According to organizers, "TEDMED believes that the future of health and medicine will be shaped by vital input from leading medical colleges, teaching hospitals, government agencies and non-profit institutions around the world." In this spirit of collaboration and information sharing, the TEDMED event is broadcast free to these institutions.
Here is a link to the lineup of speakers and a schedule if you are interested.
In the last several weeks I have been asked about impact factors when it comes to publishing. Because of these questions I decided to compile some information on impact factors from what the measure is, articles on the debate over the measure, and finally how to find it. I hope the information below is useful and do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions.
Definition
The JCR provides quantitative tools for ranking, evaluating, categorizing, and comparing journals. The impact factor is one of these; it is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year or period. The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio between citations and recent citable items published. Thus, the impact factor of a journal is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years (see Figure 1).
|
Figure 1: Calculation for journal impact factor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A= total cites in 1992 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B= 1992 cites to articles published in 1990-91 (this is a subset of A) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
C= number of articles published in 1990-91 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
D= B/C = 1992 impact factor
The impact factor is useful in clarifying the significance of absolute (or total) citation frequencies. It eliminates some of the bias of such counts which favor large journals over small ones, or frequently issued journals over less frequently issued ones, and of older journals over newer ones. Particularly in the latter case such journals have a larger citable body of literature than smaller or younger journals. All things being equal, the larger the number of previously published articles, the more often a journal will be cited. (Taken from: Thomson reuters | the thomson reuters impact factor | science Retrieved 4/9/2013, 2013, from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/) _________________________________________________________________________ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011 Impact Factor for American Journal of Critical Care
|
Factors that Influence Impact Factors
Date of Publication:
The impact factor is based solely on citation data and only looks at the citation frequency of articles from a journal in their first couple years of publication. Journals with articles that are steadily cited for a long period of time (say, 10 years) rather than only immediately lose out with this calculation.
Large vs. Small Journals:
Large and small journals are compared equally. Large journals tend to have higher impact factors--nothing to do with their quality.
Average Citation:
It's important to remember that the impact factor only looks at an average citation and that a journal may have a few highly cited papers that greatly increase its impact factor, while other papers in that same journal may not be cited at all. Therefore, there is no direct correlation between an individual article's citation frequency or quality and the journal impact factor.
Review Articles:
Impact factors are calculated using citations not only from research articles but also review articles (which tend to receive more citations), editorials, letters, meeting abstracts, and notes. The inclusion of these publications provides the opportunity for editors and publishers to manipulate the ratio used to calculate impact factor and falsely try to increase their number.
Changing / Growing Fields:
Rapidly changing and growing fields (e.g. biochemistry and molecular biology) have much higher immediate citation rates, so those journals will always have higher impact factors than nursing, for instance.
ISI's Indexing / Citation Focus:
There is unequal depth of coverage in different disciplines. In the health sciences, the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), the company which publishes impact factors, has focused much of their attention on indexing and citation data from journals in clinical medicine and biomedical research and has not focused on nursing as much. Very few nursing journals are included in their calculations (around 45). This does not mean that nursing journals they do not include are of lesser quality, and, in fact, they do not give any explanation for why some journals are included and others are not. In general, ISI focuses more heavily on journal dependent disciplines in the sciences and provides less coverage for areas of the social sciences and humanities, where books and other publishing formats are still common.
Research vs. Clinical Journals
In some disciplines such as some areas of clinical medicine where there is not a distinct separation between clinical/practitioner versus research journals, research journals tend to have higher citation rates. This may also apply to nursing.
(Taken from: Home - journal impact factors - guides at michigan state university libraries Retrieved 4/9/2013, 2013, from http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/impactfactors )
How to Find a Journal's Impact Factor
Video: How to Find a Journal's Impact Factor
Steps
- Go to the Tompkins-McCaw Library Website and click on Web of Science under search collections.
- On the Web of Science page go to the tabs at the top of the page and click on the one that says select a database.
- Select Journal Citation Reports®
- Select the JCR edition (Science or Social Science) and year that you want. When it comes to some subjects the subject appears under both editions. Nursing is one subject that appears in both editions.
- Next, select a search option (view journals by subject, search for a specific journal, or view all journals) to find if the journal you're looking for has an impact factor.
- In order to see how the journal you are interested in compares to other in a particular field, it is best to select "view a group of journals by subject category" and click submit.
- Select the topic/category you want to see from the list (You can select more than one by holding down the Ctrl key and clicking on multiple categories). Below this list of categories you can select how you would like to view the journals by going to the drop down menu and choosing accordingly.
Articles: Impact Factor Debate
- Citations are hotlinked to the article. You will need to either be on campus or authenticate in order to access them.
|
Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: use and abuse. Perspectives in publishing, 1(2).
Opthof, T. (1997). Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular research, 33(1), 1-7.
|
|
Wednesday, April 3, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Online |
|
|
Thursday, April 4, 2013 |
||
|
10:00am |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Thursday, April 4, 2013 |
||
|
7:30pm |
28th Annual Brown-Lyons Lecture: 'In Search of Answers to Life's Meaning' |
Singleton Center for the Performing Arts |
|
Monday, April 8, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Tuesday, April 9, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Wednesday, April 10, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
|
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 |
||
|
Noon |
Hunton Student Center |
|
|
Wednesday, April 24, 2013 |
||
|
12:15pm |
Online |
|
|
Tuesday, April 30, 2013 |
||
|
11:00am |
Tompkins-McCaw Library |
|
- VCU Libraries: Scholarly Communications, Copyright & Publishing
: The resources
here provide a clearinghouse of information on copyright, publishing, and
scholarly communication. The VCU Libraries supports the teaching,
research, and outreach missions of the University by guiding the faculty,
students, and staff in matters relating to the dissemination and use of
knowledge
Memberships VCU has that provide discounts to authors.
|
Membership |
Journals |
Author Discount |
|
BioMed Central, Chemistry Central, and Springer Open Journals |
15% |
|
|
All Hindawi Open Access Journals |
100% |
|
|
All PLoS Journals |
10% |
- Directory of Open Access Journals: can look up journals by topic. In the list of journals it tells if there are publishing fees and if there are it provides a link to the information about what it costs.
- University of California: Selective List of Open Access Fees: This gives a list of fees that will give some idea of the cost that are incurred.
- Beall's List of Predatory, Open-Access Publishers, 2012: This list is compiled by a librarian at the University of Colorado and something to consider. (Blog from author, also contains a running list of questionable publishers)
- Watson, R., Cleary, M., Jackson, D., & Hunt, G. E. (2012). Open access and online publishing: a new frontier in nursing?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(9), 1905-1908.
